Goal For The Green

Are we being logical about Global Warming ? Probably not, since we now call it climate change.  It might be a little ridiculous to think that man caused climate change to happen.  Sure, we are a contributing factor, but we all know that the earth undergoes sometimes drastic climate changes-naturally!  Mother Nature has never needed any help in that area.  Even if we would have heeded the warnings 30 plus years ago, after the “gas crisis,” -much of what is happening now, would still be happening.  We have no control over it.  But, we probably have contributed to our crisis by not practicing good conservation.

So, what makes us think that we can change our habits and replace our energy demands with alternative sources, in just ten years?  Today, here in the United States, only 7% of our energy comes from alternative sources.  Hydroelectric power  comprises 36% of our total alternative energy usage.  Another 5% comes from the use of wind energy.  These two sources cannot be tapped into much further, without studies of the damage it causes to already fragile ecosystems.  Fish and wildlife suffer as a paradox of our need for alternative energy sources.  It seems the only time we hear about these unfair tradeoffs, is when people protest (NIMBY) not in my back yard, when it is time to build dams and install wind turbines into already settled communities.

Today, over half of our alternative energy is in the form of biofuels.  Sources such as switchgrass (it needs an enzyme to break it down) and ethanol (corn based) are our hope for renewable energy.  Geothermal and solar power (through photovoltaic cells) offer another 6% of our current alternative energy usage.  While these sources are promising, they supply a very minor amount of our total annual energy needs.

Will we meet the goal in ten years?  Probably not, but we have to start somewhere.  It is estimated that it will cost upwards of $2.5 trillion to achieve approximately half of our home based energy needs through alternative energy sources.   Some feel that the environmental impact of biofuels is worse than that of petroleum souces.  Sure, more information is needed in these areas, but we can’t stop progress.  We must move forward.  We should make more use of resources that we already have here at home.  More use of nuclear energy, natural gas, and ways to safely make use of hydrogen should be looked at more closely.

Spend 10 relaxing minutes with me and enjoy the beauty of Nature for Barbara’s Relaxation Wednesday. Enjoy!

Autism is a complex neuro-behavioral disorder linked to early abnormalities in brain development.  The baffling odds of autism effects up to six out of every 1,000 children.  To break that down even further, it is one in every 150 children.  The characteristics are impaired social interaction, problems with verbal and non-verbal communication, and unusual or severely repetitive limited interests and activities.  They are locked away in their own little world, trapped to the world around them.

Expert theorize that it could be a combination of genetics and the environment, that are possible causes.  But, what about diet?

There are known differences in the central nervous system of a child with autism and a normal child.  At this time, there is no solid scientific proof linking autism to any dietary problem.  Some children with autism have gastrointestinal problems and compromised digestive symptoms.  Symptoms can range from constipation or diarrhea to a condition known as leaky gut syndrome.  What this means, is that a person’s intestines are very permeable, allowing extra-large protein molecules to leave the intestines.  Instead of excreting these molecules, some autistic children absorb these molecules into their bloodstreams.  When the molecules reach the brain, they create a state similar to a drug induced “high”.

In theory, when a child’s diet consists of mainly their preferred “kid food”, meaning mostly wheat and dairy, pizza, sandwiches, crackers, milk, ice-cream and yogurt, they are thought to be craving the the molecules that make them feel “high”.  It is thought that these children could benefit from the GFCF diet, (gluten-free and casein free).

Gluten is the protein found in wheat, and casein and whey are the proteins found in milk.  There are peptides found in both of these proteins, that are thought to create behavioral changes in autistic children.  There are neurotransmitters and neurorecepters in both the gut and the brain that respond to each other. Therefore, some scientists, professionals, doctors and parents believe that some children can benefit from the diet.

Gluten and casein allergies are common to many people, and produce the symptoms mentioned earlier.  However, about 20 percent of the autistic population suffers from digestion or gastrointestinal issues.  Many parents have chosen to remove the source of constant discomfort and anxiety.  This can mean removing wheat, dairy, soy, corn and even eggs.  As a result many have seen improved behaviors, better focus, and lower levels of anxiety.

Dietary intervention could be the answer or at least a “piece of the puzzle”, that can help some autistic children get on a pathway to recovery.  Many parents swear to what the GFCF diet has done for for their children.  But, more concrete evidence is needed.   There are at least seven studies currently being done at the University of Texas Science Center at Houston.  Some are double-blind studies and some are only for 4 weeks.  In all fairness, the studies on this population need to be conducted for 6-8 months to determine the best positive results.  All participants should also be tested for allergies, not just ones related to food.

For any of us, dietary change is a “choice” and a lifestyle change.  Dietary intervention for those with autism deserves careful study and consideration, not a quick study or a defeatist attitude!